Andre Poenitz wrote: > No, the cursor top is its 'tip', i.e. in the insets.
But this new slice will be the position inside this tip, right? (when you talk of main LyX text you refer to inner one?). Or maybe not. If you refer to the root one, read on. I don't understand why we have to distinguish between "main" LyXText and inner LyXText at all. The old LCursor used to be enough to point to the inner inset (it was void for the main one). We only miss the position in that inset. I.e. one can think that we only miss an aditional textcursor to the old LCUrsor? (or its mathed/text hybrid eq.) > [Probably depends how you look at it. Maybe you need to turn your screen > upside down] Maybe the problem is that I come from the other hemisphere, damnit. I used to live upside down, you know. > Won't be beneficial as the storage in the stack allows for a more > uniform approach to all LyXTexts, inset or main, later. > > This current >=1 business is transiotional... Ok. Alfredo
