On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Christian Ridderström wrote: > > And that's not because that's the natural way with the all-boxes > > approaches but because it's the way I think of the text markup. And > > not being sure whether I am inside or outside makes me uncomfortable. > > Are you thinking of a special situation here? (could you give an example) > I remember it being a bit annoying to know where you are when you use C-e, > but I couldn't find an example just now.
A somewhat related example, see attached .lyx. I guess the question here is what markup is applied to the ' ' at the end of a word. For emphasis this would only make a practical different in the output if it was printed using for instance underline. Here's the plain text from the example: Example sentence: Here is the first-word and here is the second-word i.e. differnt selection. In the sentence above, 'first-word' was selected and marked with emphasis, and 'second-word ' was marked with empahsis. Note the extra ' ' at the end of 'second-word '. When moving the cursor at the end of the 'words', the emphasis-mode is exactly the same... Is the ' ' in emphasis or not? /Christian -- Christian Ridderström http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
#LyX 1.3 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/ \lyxformat 221 \textclass article \language english \inputencoding auto \fontscheme default \graphics default \paperfontsize default \spacing single \papersize Default \paperpackage a4 \use_geometry 0 \use_amsmath 0 \use_natbib 0 \use_numerical_citations 0 \paperorientation portrait \secnumdepth 3 \tocdepth 3 \paragraph_separation indent \defskip medskip \quotes_language english \quotes_times 2 \papercolumns 1 \papersides 1 \paperpagestyle default \layout Standard Example sentence: \layout Quote Here is the \emph on first-word \emph default and here is the \emph on second-word \emph default i.e. differnt selection. \layout Standard In the sentence above, 'first-word' was selected and marked with emphasis, and 'second-word ' was marked with empahsis. Note the extra ' ' at the end of 'second-word '. When moving the cursor at the end of the 'words', the emphasis-mode is exactly the same... Is the ' ' in emphasis or not? \the_end