On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Christian Ridderström wrote:

> > And that's not because that's the natural way with the all-boxes
> > approaches but because it's the way I think of the text markup. And
> > not being sure whether I am inside or outside makes me uncomfortable. 
> 
> Are you thinking of a special situation here? (could you give an example)
> I remember it being a bit annoying to know where you are when you use C-e,
> but I couldn't find an example just now.

A somewhat related example, see attached .lyx. I guess the question here 
is what markup is applied to the ' ' at the end of a word.
For emphasis this would only make a practical different in the output if 
it was printed using for instance underline.

Here's the plain text from the example:
Example sentence:

Here is the first-word and here is the second-word i.e. differnt 
selection.

In the sentence above, 'first-word' was selected and marked with emphasis, 
and 'second-word ' was marked with empahsis. Note the extra ' ' at the end 
of 'second-word '. When moving the cursor at the end of the 'words', the 
emphasis-mode is exactly the same... Is the ' ' in emphasis or not?

/Christian


-- 
Christian Ridderström                           http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
#LyX 1.3 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
\lyxformat 221
\textclass article
\language english
\inputencoding auto
\fontscheme default
\graphics default
\paperfontsize default
\spacing single 
\papersize Default
\paperpackage a4
\use_geometry 0
\use_amsmath 0
\use_natbib 0
\use_numerical_citations 0
\paperorientation portrait
\secnumdepth 3
\tocdepth 3
\paragraph_separation indent
\defskip medskip
\quotes_language english
\quotes_times 2
\papercolumns 1
\papersides 1
\paperpagestyle default

\layout Standard

Example sentence:
\layout Quote

Here is the 
\emph on 
first-word
\emph default 
 and here is the 
\emph on 
second-word 
\emph default 
i.e.
 differnt selection.
\layout Standard

In the sentence above, 'first-word' was selected and marked with emphasis,
 and 'second-word ' was marked with empahsis.
 Note the extra ' ' at the end of 'second-word '.
 When moving the cursor at the end of the 'words', the emphasis-mode is
 exactly the same...
 Is the ' ' in emphasis or not?
\the_end

Reply via email to