Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:

>>>>>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> Angus> * I think that I would like to give the External inset
> dialogs Angus> the ability to rotate, resize and crop their data.
> This Angus> involves additions to qt/QExternal* and
> xforms/FormExternal* Angus> only.
> 
> Angus> That would make InsetExternal an almost-drop-in replacement
> for Angus> InsetGraphics. (Wouldn't handle "subfigure".) Jean-Marc
> stated Angus> that he thought that this would be the wrong way to go
> but I'd Angus> like to try it out anyway.
> 
> Did I say that? I remember not liking a rotate inset, but having
> external insets being able to do that would be nice. Actually, I
> thought you already did that :)

It's in the inset but not in the dialog. (Coding up dialogs is a 
PITA.)

Actually, what you said is that having a single inset that was able 
to handle any 'external' data (ie InsetExternal) would result in a UI 
something like that of PowerPoint where a single dialog controls the 
input of many, conceptually different, 'external's.

Or something like that.

John's suggestion was to have the Graphics dialog also connected to 
ControlExternal. Ie, two dialogs resulting in the input/manipulation 
of a single Inset.

I can see the argument for, but I can also see the argument against. 
I also think that this is a second step.

-- 
Angus

Reply via email to