On Monday 16 June 2003 16:37, Angus Leeming wrote: > > I wonder... > > Many, many users have requested that we provide better support for > commentary. That is, that we provide the ability to "tune" the output > from InsetNote. > > Could we not provide the inset dialog with a check box > [] export to LaTeX > and provide the ability to "wrap" this output with a header and a > tail.
I was thinking more about a different way to associate any inset with some "class". Then we would have another dialog where we could say for the different classes if they are outputed or not. > > A Problems document, with and without solution sets, to the students > and to the examiners... Like in this case, there are insets that belong to the class "Solution" and that can, or not, be outputed. It does not make sense to do that on an inset per inset basis. As I understand it this is what Martin is proposing, to have those classes that I stated. The other important question that Lars asked is if this paragraph level is enough for branches. For all those cases that were proposed as examples I would expect that paragraph level insets to be enough. > The collapsable inset concept provides an immediate and intuitive > solution. True. -- José Abílio
