Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 04:37:09PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> > No. do not overload InsetNote, create a InsetBranch instead.
>>
>> I wonder...
>>
>> Many, many users have requested that we provide better support for
>> commentary. That is, that we provide the ability to "tune" the
>> output from InsetNote.
>>
>> Could we not provide the inset dialog with a check box
>> [] export to LaTeX
>> and provide the ability to "wrap" this output with a header and a
>> tail.
>>
>> Eg
>> \begin{comment} Contents of inset \end{comment}
>> \begin{branch1} Contents of inset \end{branch1}
>
> Looks like InsetEnv, doesn't it?
Ssshhhhh. Do you know how sick Martin will be of us if we finally
turn round and tell him that the functionality for branches already
exists...
--
Angus
