On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 01:45:03PM +0200, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:

> * No shortcut for "Ok", what about "_O_k"
> * No shortcut for "Selected", what about "_S_elected"
> * No shortcut for "Available", what about "A_v_ailable"
> * No shortcut for "Citation style", what about "C_i_tation style"
> * No shortcut for "Text after", what about "_T_ext after"

Done, thanks.

> * What about adding a way to manually specify the name of a citation?

This will complicate the dialog ... not good... I'm not sure but
Qt doesn't seem to let QListBox's do the "type out the contents"
selection.

>   Just like you can do in the "Insert Cross Reference" dialog.
> * Some references are not shown in the "info" area. This seems to be 
>   references that you have added to your "Selected" list.
>   Consequently, you can't see their info after having selected them...

I do not understand this report.

> * The "Next" and "Previous" use M-n and M-p as shortcuts... being used to 
>   Emacs, it would nice if C-s and C-r could be added as well. (This is a
>   luxury, I know...)

Please explain how they work in emacs ('s' ?? 'r' ???)

> * In the list of available citations, <Enter> adds a citation, but there 
>   is no shortcut for removing a citation (from "Selected").
>   How about adding shortcuts such as:
>       <Ins>  = Add citation      (when used in "Avalable")
>       <Del>  = Remove citation   (when used in "Selected")
>       <Left> = Add citation      (when used in "Available")
>       <Right> = Remove citation  (when used in "Selected")
>   I think the <Left>/<Right> shortcuts would natural.

File on bugzilla, reasonable request but a bit more work.

This dialog needs an overhaul. I think Search stuff should move to a
separate semi-modal dialog, this leaves more space. Of course, we should
make sure that this is quickly accessible, for the  academic types.

I also don't like the two-list approach. It's confusing. I must admit,
I'm having trouble thinking of another way, though.

What *is* odd though, is why we have "selected" and *then* "available".
It is surely more logical to have them the other way round horizontally.

regards,
john

Reply via email to