On środa 12 marzec 2003 03:11 am, John Levon wrote: > On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 08:54:36AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > > As a sidenote: I thing that too many large patches have gone in lately > > without posting to the list and getting comments. Even if the > > repository is open we should try to aim for a peer reviewed > > methodology. > > This means I get to do one patch a day ... CVS is just useless at this. > I'm just supposed to find something else to do when I've got insomnia / > stupid sleeping patterns and want to do some hacking ? > > You either get this, or you get one big patch at the end of it that > *nobody* will read. Unless you know of some really smart way to get CVS > to auto-switch between local and remote repositories: then with a little > work I can do things in small stages and submit them one by one without > a 24-hour cycle between each one. > > So what am I to do ?
No sarcasm intended, but I'd drop CVS and switch to Aegis. I'm using Aegis and it does exactly what you're looking for. No need to write scripts to do simple things like that. Cheers, Kuba Ober PS. Okay, that's wishful thinking, because for whatever reason the developer communities prefer to suffer with CVS rather than moving to something better :( People shrug at Aegis and keep using CVS, which they complain about. I use Aegis and live a better life. Your choice ;-)))
