Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > No, not really. I would be easy enough to set and rest the bv as a
| > member in the lyxtext.
|
| What I say is to have only one bv for every lyxtext.
|
| So you want to do this lyxtext sharing because of the particular case in
| which the (say two) bv have exactly the same width?
No, not lyxtext charing, but the ability to move a lyxtext between
bvs.
If you have the same buffer visible in two bvs at the same time then
there also needs to be two lyxtext.
--
Lgb
