John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 04:48:31PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
|
| > | I don't think anybody would grieve for the loss of DEPM, as initiates
| > | into its ways know it. I would say: GO FOR IT. I bet it's not even
| > | mega-hard !
| >
| > depm is not the complexity that I would work to remove first. I'd
| > rather try to get rid of the hardcoded label stuff....
|
| How do we do that ?
|
| > | > Then you need several lyxtexts (all sharing the same buffer), because a
| > | > lyxtext depends on the size of the view.
| > |
| > | That's a very good point :)
| >
| > Rember that a given lyxtext can move between views, if the views have
| > the same with.
|
| The cache ? So lets not do that if it's complicating the code
| everywhere.
The use of the cache does not complicate code in a lot of places...
only a couple of places in BufferView.
| Why is moving lyxtexts useful ?
speed.
--
Lgb
