On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 12:36:44PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >> You should add an error message at the end of qkey_to_string and > >> string_to_qkey to find the missng entries and both should rely on a > >> common table > > John> No, can't work. > > What do you mean? The attached patch adds an error message to > string_to_qkey and fixes a number of errors found using it. It is > probably not a good idea to use it as is.
*that's* ok, but you can't add it to the other function. > John> That neither. Believe me, this stuff is REALLY fubar. And there > John> is nothing we can do about it. > > Give me one good reason why a common table cannot be used in both > functions? All [A-Za-z] have to fall through, as there is no Qt::Key_a vs. Qt::Key_A If you really think you can fix this stuff nicely, PLEASE do so. I would be ecstatic. But prepare to be annoyed (and you'll probably need Qt 2 and Qt 3 build to test with ;) > Yes, but this is not the problem I am trying to solve. My problem is > in the inaccuracy of the symbols that we are already supposed to > handle :) certainly the attached patch looks ok regards john -- Khendon's Law: If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.
