On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 08:38:06AM -0500, Kuba Ober wrote: > Wasn't it so that Qt 2.x didn't recognize them, and then Qt 3.x started to > properly recognize them?
I don't know, is it ? > Is there any particular reason why lyx needs to support Qt 2.x? It's pretty > outdated and has some bugs that are fixed only in 3.x... (Yep, I know 3.x > needs more memory for the code, but there are a few things that got optimized > in 3.x re. template instance memory sizes, so it's not such a bad deal > methinks). > > Maybe dropping support for qt 2.x would cure many such oddities? 2.3.1 was released June 2001. That's not what I call outdated, sorry. I don't know when 2.3.2 was released; it wasn't announced. Many universities are on 2-3 year upgrade cycles. And I doubt there are many Qt lyx bugs that are fixed in 3.0 cycle. regards john -- Khendon's Law: If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.
