Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

| On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 11:31:02AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > actually it is working just as I planned it to work.
| 
| Whereas it might have been preferable (only from a purely practical, not to
| say opportunistic point of view...) if it acted a bit more similar to the
| original code ;-}

Let me also say that it is working just as I thought it should work.
And in all cases, barring two, that is the situation...
 
-- 
        Lgb

Reply via email to