On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 01:03:55PM +0000, John Levon wrote: > Um, last thread everyone but you agreed this change was a regression,
I changed this as Jean-Marc complained about the duplication IIRC. > and needed some mathed change to get back to the previous behaviour. None that I am aware of. > You introduced a major regression (removing the items) and a minor one > (equating the "enabled" state for both mathed and tabular). Ok, could be that the state question was the "required code change". > If you refuse to fix the latter, fine. I can fix the first one myself Than for $DEITY's sake do that. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
