>>>>> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 06:30:06PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote:
>> - how come lfun_prior and lfun_next are not implemented in 1.2.2?
Andre> Probably because I implemented them in the 1.3 cycle?
OK, I'll forget about those for now (unless you have a patch for me?)
>> - why are lfun_wordleftsel and lfun_wordrightsel just ignored
>> instead of being equivalent to lfun_homesel and lfun_endsel (which
>> would be more coherent)?
Andre> They are not ignored but handled as lfun_leftsel and
Andre> lfun_rightsel.
This is indeed the case in 1.3.0cvs (BTW, don't you see that it is
strange to have lfun_wordleft == lfun_home but lfun_wordleftsel ==
lfun_leftsel).
In 1.2.2.cvs, I see
case LFUN_WORDRIGHTSEL:
case LFUN_WORDLEFTSEL:
break;
Which really looks like something which is not implemented.
JMarc
