On Wednesday 02 October 2002 7:17 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 11:45:15AM +0900, Rob Lahaye wrote:
> > but my compiler doesn't like this and complains that the
> > second "input" is unknown. Is my compiler funny, or is this
> > example code wrong?
>
> I think the code is wrong.
>
> > CheckedGlueLength::CheckedGlueLength(FL_OBJECT * input,
> > FL_OBJECT * label)
> > : input_(input), label_(label ? label : input)
> > {
> > lyx::Assert(input && input->objclass == FL_INPUT);
> > }
> >
> > Is that acceptable C++ coding?
>
> For me yes.Rob, here's an updated patch to replace what you have already. It incorporates some bugfixes, your suggestions and most of those made by Allan (off-list). It also gives you a checkLyXLength() function for ... well, you know. I suspect that you'lll be able to simplify those input() methods considerably. Keep up the good work! Regards, Angus
checked_widgets.diff.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
