On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 04:14:07PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 04:08:17PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Andre> depth-increment can be implemented as cut, insert inset of the
> > Andre> same kind, move cursor, paste. Prefarably without touching the
> > Andre> cut buffer.
> >
> > Except that you may want to go into an existing inset. And you would
> > have to do inset merging in the case of
>
> Indeed. Looks managable, however, if you can express one idea in one
> statement and do not have to wait until the phase of the moon is ok.
Should you implement this in mathed?
For example: if you have \mathbf{a}b\mathbf{c}, then should deleting
the 'b' give you \mathbf{ac} ?
