On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 04:08:17PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Andre> depth-increment can be implemented as cut, insert inset of the > Andre> same kind, move cursor, paste. Prefarably without touching the > Andre> cut buffer. > > Except that you may want to go into an existing inset. And you would > have to do inset merging in the case of
Indeed. Looks managable, however, if you can express one idea in one statement and do not have to wait until the phase of the moon is ok. > And usability? Complaints from users? How many people do we have > complaining that pressing space at the end of a math inset does not > insert a space anymore. All of them I. Including me. > Andre> No. Entering/leaving ERT has exactly the same kind of problems > Andre> font changes as insets would have. > > I was allusing to the collapsible nature or ert insets. And anyway ert > insets should not be too easy to use, since we do not want to > encourage them too much. Writing documents is too easy. Otherwise we'd not read as much crap as we do. So we should make writing docs much harder. > So I do not care too much about this one. You should put quotes when you quote. > Do you also plan to put all centered paragraphs into a InsetCentering? > This would definitely simplify the code. I have not thought about this yet. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
