On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 11:08:23AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> My idea of LyX (which is btw supported by the propaganda items on
> lyx.org) is that it is (a) _not_ a conventional wordprocessor, and (b) that
> it supports writing _based on the stucture_ of the document.
>
> So at least from a theoretical point of view you'd either have to adjust
> the claims on lyx.org or accept that using a structural approach for
> document writing may interfere with your habits of using a conventional
> wordprocessor.
This is assuming that your font insets is the only structural approach.
Which is wrong. I do not see in what way font insets are any more
structural than what the main text does.
Face it, André, these font insets *suck* from a usability standpoint, no
ifs, no buts. They might be livable in mathed where text regions rarely
last longer than a letter or two, but it would be unbearable in normal
text
regards
john
--
"Please crack down on the Chinaman's friends and Hitler's commander. Mother is
the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast. A boy has never wept ...
nor dashed a thousand kim. Did you hear me?"
- Dutch Schultz
