On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 05:36:58PM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote: > > Not good; you should switch tooltip depending up on what it will > >actually do > > Reusing "tooltips().init()" for a second time on a widget is not working. > Problably a buggy implementation of tooltips. The present patch has the code > to switch the tooltip text, but it's not effective.
OK, fine. > I realized that by switching the button's text, also the shortcut needs to > be "revived" along with "re"-showing the button. That's also included now; > the whole switch is bundled in a single function "switch_go_button()". Good. > >3. Not sure about the "Go to" change actually. > > Neither am I, but it's not that bad either, is it? > I actually got the naming form Qt :). heh :) > Done; I mean, the tooltip does not comment the bug anymore; the bug is > still there though :(. But, eh, is it really a bug? What if same > filenames appear in different directories; without the full path the > choice could to be ambiguous, but of course the full path is > internally known! I agree the way it works now is not nice. What is needed is elipsis or a horizontal scrollbar. Alternatively, some disambiguation code if necessary. (Personally I have no idea why we have this dialog in LyX *at all*) > Fixed. > This was a result of yet another bug in fdesign. ouch :) thanks. > >7. I'm not entirely sure the visual assocation of the spellchecker is a > >good idea. It looks like the 3 buttons operate on the replacements > >list... (but "Replace" is good) > > New layout better? On balance, I think so. regards john -- "Are you willing to go out there and save the lives of our children, even if it means losing your own life ? Yes I am. I believe you, Jeru... you're ready."
