On Sunday 18 August 2002 11:01 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | On Friday 16 August 2002 9:09 am, Andre Poenitz wrote: > | > On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 09:50:53AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | > > | Actually I think this implements _your_ idea of "every interaction > | > > | between frontend and core should go through an LFUN" rather well. > | > > > | > > This is not how I read it... I read it more that all LFUNS go through > | > > dialogs... > | > > | > Ok, than let's wait until Angus is back. I think he wants just to call > | > dispatch() from a dialog's apply() instead of hard-wiring the > | > connection to the inset by a Inset* member. [And I certainly like > | > _this_ idea.] > | > | That's exactly what I want to do. The frontends should call dispatch() > | and then its up to the core to decide what to do with the data. > | > | Lars, I can't see how you've reached your conclusion. It's exactly upside > | down to what I mean! > > the LFUN_OPEN, LFUN_CLOSE ting...
So someone useing the LyX server or the minibuffer can request that LyX open or close a dialog. What's that got to do with control by the frontends? it's telling the frontend to do something.
