On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 08:00:08PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Please review this and comment.
I don't like this "de/increasePosAfterPos" thing, it's thoroughly
confusing to name two different things pos.
How about :
void fixupPos(InsetList::iterator b, InsetList::iterator e, int amount)
then :
fixupPos(pos, end, 1)
fixupPos(pos, end, -1)
or even
std::for_each(pos, end, fixupPos(-1));
it's not very nice that the inset table is loosely coupled with the
paragraph in this respect but I don't think of a better solution right
now.
regards
john
--
"It is unbecoming for young men to utter maxims."
- Aristotle
