John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| What is the standard way to get around the icky std::map requirement
| that the value object have a default ctor ? This is forcing me to not
| only havea pointless default no-argument ctor, but stop using references
| in the struct value for no good reason :(
If you use references as class variables, then you will be hampered
when trying to put it in a stl::container...
You could do as they do in the stl and take a reference are, but store
the pointer. We should probably introduce a new smartpointer for that
then.
held_ptr<> perhaps.
A pointer that we should do nothing with when we go out of scope.
--
Lgb
