Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Friday 05 July 2002 5:01 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: | > Could people please make their minds up whether "inset unification" as I | > have it in mind (i.e. heavy re-use of mathed infrastructure for the "real" | > LyX insets) is a Good or a Bad Thing? | > | > If the latter, it would be nice if a few (if possible technical) reasons | > were given. I gave a few for the 'pro' side in a previous mail, so I think | > they do not need to be repeated. | > | > There is no need to hurry as I am off for the weekend now and can't do | > anything anyway before Monday. | > | > Andre' | | It is modt definitely a good thing. The current implementation (locking inset | et al) is almost impossible to follow unless you already know how it works.
The question is whether this should be a 1.4 feature instead of an 1.3. one. I want us to get 1.3. out quickly.
