On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 10:45:02AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > I'm of the same opinion; we need this only when a document is loaded. But we > > still need to dump the preamble if we're to get user-defined macros et al. > > I though Herbert did some work on that part.
yes, my preview.gifs, which I sent where build with the "real" preamble. > Note that "the preamble" is not sufficient anyway. We would need "local" > defines etc as well to make it "Right"... > > > I've tried to define a converter that can be used by both the batch processor > > and by the image loader. Ie, it'll work for both multiple and single images. > > Fine. > > > > I need a factor of 2 here with 95 and 150. That's not the conventional > > > multiplication... > > > > Where's the 150 come from? That's 130 to you: 95 * 1.3 = 123.5. > > My screen zoom. > > > We need to split Buffer::makeLaTeXFile into two so that we can just grab the > > preamble. Thereafter, the PreambleQueue class is finished too I believe. > > As I said, local defines would break that scheme. But I think we currently > don't have the infrastructure to work around this problem. it is very easy to add an additional bool only_header. Juast the same like nice_file. Herbert
