>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> I belive that I was wrong with that statement. Are now safe as Lars> well, well, because we use the layout names when switching Lars> classes. OK, if you say so. Lars> | This is getting more interesting. Do you plan to do it? Lars> This would only be a failsafe check, it should never trigger. An assert? Lars> True, but bald pointers are never safe. One reason is that you Lars> can never know if the object is still there. One other option is Lars> to store a weak_ptr in the layouts. Lars> A weak_ptr is a companion to shared_ptr. when the shared_ptr is Lars> deleted the pointer insed the weak_ptr is set to NULL. I did not know these ones. JMarc
