Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
| Lars> | Lars> This reduces binary size a tiny bit, and should remove
| Lars> the | Lars> LyXTextClass::operator[]() overhead.
>>>
| Lars> | Lars> If I get no objections this will go in soonish.
>>>
| Lars> | This patch is certainly a good idea, but it also means that we
| Lars> have no | chance to avoid restarting lyx after reconfigure when
| Lars> a file is | loaded.
>
| Lars> Hmm... why is that? (and what do reconfigure have to do with
| Lars> this?)
>
| Because we would need to re-read the textclasses (I think) and this
| would invalidate the pointers. Am I wrong?
But we are not doing that now anyway...
| Lars> | Apart from that, LyXLayout_ptr is certainly an ugly name.
>
| Lars> Give me a better name and I will change it.
>
| Is it really necessary to gain access to the boost shared_pointer?
Perhaps not... eh yes. You are not allowed to keep a LyXLayout*, or a
LyXLayout&, both can be deleted under you and result in a crash.
--
Lgb
