On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 06:11:34PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: ...
> >> > >> Martin's patch. What blocks it being an inset now ? Why can't the ground > >> work for that be done first ? > > > | Lack of skill, simply. This at least *works as is* and fixes a > | hall-of-shame class feature deficiency *now*. > > But is not a lyx dialog... so you are limited by the gui lib to what > can be entered there... can I add an inset f.ex.? That is precisely why Jean-Marc put a stop to it last time. You have to enter an xforms string (which can of course contain manual ERT, but that's ugly) and yes, no insets e.g. (What precisely would you want to do with that BTW? Put a favicon into a TOC entry? I feel it's a rather theoretical restriction.) Anyway that's why it should be an inset containing an InsetText (But precisely what kind of inset? And how to restrict where you can put it / what you can put into it? And how does the section pick up the opt arg from within it?). Which I have timidly started to experiment with. C++ is hell :-) > -- > Lgb Martin
msg39574/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
