On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 01:54:18AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> It is there just to be able to turn off bidi, then imho it should be > >> removed. Less special cases and behaviour changing with different > >> parameters turned on/off. > > > | Exactly. So you would be happy to see it excised ? I know I would, in > | the absence of a good reason to keep it. > > Let's hear from Dekel first.
I'll look into it.
