John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 01:30:19AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >> Hu? >> >> It is there just to be able to turn off bidi, then imho it should be >> removed. Less special cases and behaviour changing with different >> parameters turned on/off. > | Exactly. So you would be happy to see it excised ? I know I would, in | the absence of a good reason to keep it.
Let's hear from Dekel first.
--
Lgb
