>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> But all I hear is this mantra in the background "revert revert Lars> revert" This is because you do not want to hear the arguments which go alongside this mantra. It is _you_ who have to convince us that this was a wise move, actually. All I hear is this mantra in the background "modern C++, modern C++, modern C++". Of course, if LyX managed to get funding from the Modern C++ Propaganda Fund, I would be willing to reconsider my position. Lars> Not even an feeble attempt at trying to help fix anything, or Lars> even look at alternative solutions. Because 'revert' is not a valid alternative solution? JMarc
