John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 12:17:04PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >> Also please not that gcc 3.1 produces much smaller binaries than 2.96. >> (at least a bit) > | gcc3.1 1.3cvs is still 25% larger than gcc2.96 1.2.1cvs, after stripping | lyx. (4026240 vs. 3276028) (and yes size says pretty much the same | thing)
apples and oranges....
--
Lgb
