John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 12:34:15PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> I am not sure I am in complete agreement with this one...
>
| I think there needs to be some refactoring done here anyway. Many
| of the accessors never made much sense to me. But I feel really queasy
| about a setWindowTitle() method in core code, and the fact that it will
| be the only case in a simple GUII inheritance hierarchy where the
| toolkit-specific versions inherit from something in core code. Source
| discoverability is good, and code to update the environment combo truly
| belongs in frontends/
>
| The important thing to note is that this is of course a first iteration.
| It's not meant to be perfectly factored, and it certainly isn't.
>
>> send the patch for a lookee..
>
| Attached. Boring huh ? Shout if you want a look at the proper GUII
| LyXView files too (iirc they're not that different)
>
>> And we get one humongous merge into head later on... eh...
>
| Actually I was thinking of the exact opposite. We create a branch, apply
| the huge patch to it, fix stuff up, then merge bit by bit back to the
| trunk.
Yes, that sounds ok.
and just apply this patch.
--
Lgb
