Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 03:13:11PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Note that the problems will lyxstring will only get bigger.... by
>> clinging to it we introduce a lot of ineffencies (conversion between
>> lyxstring->char*->std::string and back... with all the extra
>> allocations that result in), also because of these
>> conversions strings cannot give any meaning to '\0' (and we
>
| I know. lyxstring was not my idea, though ;-)
No... it was mine...
>> IMHO lystring is just looking less and less favorable.
>
| Which compiler that we support does not have a sufficient std::string?
None that I know of.
| Another thing: I just had a look at lyxlenght.[Ch].
>
| Why the hack is it in such a state? I seem to remember making 'cleaning up
| patches' at least twice...
No idea.
--
Lgb
