On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 03:13:11PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Note that the problems will lyxstring will only get bigger.... by > clinging to it we introduce a lot of ineffencies (conversion between > lyxstring->char*->std::string and back... with all the extra > allocations that result in), also because of these > conversions strings cannot give any meaning to '\0' (and we
I know. lyxstring was not my idea, though ;-) > IMHO lystring is just looking less and less favorable. Which compiler that we support does not have a sufficient std::string? /// Another thing: I just had a look at lyxlenght.[Ch]. Why the hack is it in such a state? I seem to remember making 'cleaning up patches' at least twice... Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
