Michael Koziarski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| At 11:49 PM 4/1/02 +0100, you wrote:
>>On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 11:26:00PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>> > | Either way, of course, I wasn't suggesting it needs to be fixed for 1.2
>> > | ...
>> >
>> > Then mark it as "later" in bugzilla.
>> > or with a milestone of 1.3.0CVS
>>
>>Maybe we've been using bugzilla differently
>
>
| Here's how I understand it from how the GNOME, redhat and Mozilla guys use it.
>
| A target milestone means, This bug will be fixed in release X.
| No milestone means, it's a bug. We will fix it, just don't know when.
| LATER, means. I don't consider this important at all, It will be
| fixed at some indefinite later date. though probably only
| accidentally.
>
| Also, target milestones should probably be releases rather than CVS.
Very well, but how do we say that "this 'bug' will be fixed during the
next develpment cycle"
--
Lgb
