>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Lars> | Lars> The first cleanup iteration will get rid of this. >> Lars> | Great. However, if it appears that what Martin proposes Lars> actually fixes | our problems, I suggest to defer this until Lars> after 1.2.0. Lars> Perhaps... but we still have the problem when converting between Lars> layouts, no? I'm not sure in what circumstances it can still happen. John mentionned something about undo/change_class/redo, but I do not know what really happens. Anyway, are you sure that using strings removes all needs to update layouts? For example, if in the new class the given layout is obsolete (which can be thought as a way for a class to say how a given style should be translated), will it work out transparently? JMarc
