>>>>> "Herbert" == Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Herbert> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> his one-line fix to updateWidgetsFromLengthString,
Herbert> it maybe not important, but I suppose that the unit "%"
Herbert> will be misleading to a lot of users. Shouldn't we better
Herbert> delete this one? Otherwise we always have the questions: 100%
Herbert> of what?
This reminds me of a question I had when working on those lyxlength
recently:
The latex output for the different type of % gives:
switch(unit_) {
case PW:
case PE:
buffer << abs(static_cast<int>(val_/100)) << "."
<< abs(static_cast<int>(val_)%100) << "\\columnwidth";
break;
case PP:
buffer << abs(static_cast<int>(val_/100)) << "."
<< abs(static_cast<int>(val_)%100) << "\\paperwidth";
break;
case PL:
buffer << abs(static_cast<int>(val_/100)) << "."
<< abs(static_cast<int>(val_)%100) << "\\linewidth";
break;
This means that we do not have anything which does % of \textwidth!
(\paperwidth was \pagewidth before, which does not exist).
I think that PW, which is I think related to "%" should have a
case PW:
buffer << abs(static_cast<int>(val_/100)) << "."
<< abs(static_cast<int>(val_)%100) << "\\textwidth";
break;
Thoughts?
JMarc
