Garst R. Reese wrote: >>- Find & replace ignores math formula; bug or feature?
> Find & replace ignores lots of things, and has limited replace > capabilities. > I would call this a feature request rather than either a bug or > feature. Yes, and I don't really miss this feature. On the other side, I have noticed that Andre has committed some math code which was related to find&replace. Maybe our math guru likes to tell us whether this feature is broken or just missing? In the latter case, this is not a call for implementation. Michael