Allan Rae wrote: > >I'll check my copy of, of, ummm, I've forgotten the name. >It's about implementing patterns as templates. > >Allan. (ARRae) > Been there, tried that, but John and I didn't succeed. Good luck.
I thought that we could use the Barton and Nackman trick (see Scientific and Engineering C++, by same authors, named after a pattern that was used extensively in that book), but you can't re-define a virtual method by inheriting it through another base class. Ben.
