On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, John Levon wrote: > > here's a working example of what Ben had designed (did this so I > could work out what he was saying :) > > Dunno about others, but I prefer the name of visitInset to stay > the same no matter what ... > > the two problems ben has been trying to fix with this (accompanied > by stupid questions from myself) are : > > 1) each inset has to be listed in InsetVisitor > > 2) each inset HAS to have an acceptVisitor() method > > I still think it's worth it, even better if anyone can solve either > of these problems ...
I'll check my copy of, of, ummm, I've forgotten the name. It's about implementing patterns as templates. Allan. (ARRae)
