On Tue, Nov 20, 2001 at 02:31:12PM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote: > > are going to be edited, there is a mouseclick for you!" > > Probably you're right, but I wouldn't invert that right now. Only do it > if you're REALLY sure that it does not change semantics in some insets!
I am not going to do anything there, I was just poking around a bit. And I have admit that I have serious problems understanding these things out there... > We already did a lot of such "seamingly" easy to fix changes and IMO we > get more and more unstable because of them! I remember that some stuff > in Insets did work correctly last time I had time to fix it up but now > some "working" stuff does not work anymore and IMO that is is because of > removal of some code which "seemed" unused or wrong! > > So IMO we should stop removing code also if it seems stupid and concentrate > on the big buglist which is to fix. If we have to change/remove code to FIX > a bug than this is ok but just changing code now which we mean it's not used > is dangerous! You won't tempt me into a "fix appearances vs fix properly" discussion ;-) Andre' -- André Pönitz .............................................. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
