Am Mittwoch, 7. November 2001 17:18 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > >>>>> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>> writes: > > Juergen> We could of course use geometry for the AMS-classes and > other Juergen> classes who don't support landscape natively. I > haven't Juergen> checked, but it seems to me that ejour belongs to > these ones, Juergen> too. Are we supposed to do this? What do the > LaTeX gurus say? > > I'm not a LaTeX guru, but we could have yet another tag in the layout > file to declare the options it know about (or a tag explicitely for > landscape).
Something like: NoOption landscape which means that we have to chose geometry automatically if the user choses landscape? This would probably be the best, since then the authors of new layout files are responsible and we do not have to take care when a new stylefile comes in. If we can agree on this solution I can check which of the current classes do not support landscape and have a look if I can implement this. Hints on how to do this are very welcome, though. Jürgen. > JMarc
