Herbert Voss wrote:
>
> Dekel Tsur wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 03:46:07PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> > > > | > | Since we are continuously adding new features to LyX, reLyX stays behind,
> > > > | > | so a lyx->latex->lyx cycle can loose information.
> > >
> > > as I said: from a users sight lyx->latex is only important
> > > to find critical errors or to convert some stuff to whatelse
> > > ever.
> > > why should I do a lyx->latex->lyx cycle?
> >
> > You need it if you work on a document with a coauthor which doesn't have LyX.
>
> this is the only reason??
Last week I had to write a largish document in raw LaTeX for precisely
this reason.
Anyway, there's also this related scenario: you need to make some
changes to your document on somebody else's computer. You don't have LyX
1.2.x installed, so you edit the exported LaTeX. Later back home, you
struggle to spot all the changes and retype them into LyX.
Regards,
Eran Tromer
