Dekel Tsur wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 03:46:07PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: > > > | > | Since we are continuously adding new features to LyX, reLyX stays behind, > > > | > | so a lyx->latex->lyx cycle can loose information. > > > > as I said: from a users sight lyx->latex is only important > > to find critical errors or to convert some stuff to whatelse > > ever. > > why should I do a lyx->latex->lyx cycle? > > You need it if you work on a document with a coauthor which doesn't have LyX. this is the only reason?? Herbert -- http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/
- Re: lyx file format changes Juergen Vigna
- Re: lyx file format changes Andre Poenitz
- Re: lyx file format changes Dekel Tsur
- Re: lyx file format changes Andre Poenitz
- Re: lyx file format changes Dekel Tsur
- Re: lyx file format changes Dekel Tsur
- Re: lyx file format changes Kayvan A. Sylvan
- Re: lyx file format changes Herbert Voss
- Re: lyx file format changes Andre Poenitz
- Re: lyx file format changes Dekel Tsur
- Re: lyx file format changes Herbert Voss
- Re: lyx file format changes Andre Poenitz
- Re: lyx file format changes Thomas Steffen
- Re: lyx file format changes Eran Tromer
- Re: lyx file format changes Herbert Voss
- Re: lyx file format changes ben
- Re: lyx file format changes Andre Poenitz
- Re: lyx file format changes Michael Koziarski
- Re: lyx file format changes Amir Karger
- Re: lyx file format changes Andre Poenitz
- Re: lyx file format changes Helge Hafting