Dekel Tsur wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2001 at 03:46:07PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> > > | > | Since we are continuously adding new features to LyX, reLyX stays behind,
> > > | > | so a lyx->latex->lyx cycle can loose information.
> >
> > as I said: from a users sight lyx->latex is only important
> > to find critical errors or to convert some stuff to whatelse
> > ever.
> > why should I do a lyx->latex->lyx cycle?
> 
> You need it if you work on a document with a coauthor which doesn't have LyX.

this is the only reason??

Herbert

-- 
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/

Reply via email to