Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | >
> | > | > BTW, I agree that the ERT insets should (always/by default) be inlined.
> | > | > Some of my documents look *really* awful now.
> | > |
> | > | http://www.perce.de/lyx/LyXAPL2.lyx (200kb)
> | > |
> | > | is a 1.1.6fix2 lyx-file. please load it with latest
> | > | cvs and tell me the sense of the new ert-inset.
> | >
> | > I must admit that I feel that you are falling for your own grip... You
> | > use too much ERT and for things that has never been guaranteed to
> | > work. But I am sure the compability reading can be made even better.
> | > More specific cases that goes wrong would be nice.
> |
> | do you want to tell me, that i can get the same
> | output with less ert?? ;-)
>
> you used [!htb] a lot... in all places? if so not needed. (and the new
> float will most likely "crash" on this use of ert.
as far as i remember you wanted individual control of placing
floats by lyx?
anyway, the problem are not all floats but only the one
which has to be placed in a different way. therefore i
had to control all floats, because lyx don't support
the other way. therefore ert for all.
> | my problem is a user-one! i can't understand your decision
> | to change ert. Kayvan said, that the code my be cleaner.
>
> In particular we get rid of the artificial "latex" font style, that
> was what buggged us the most.
i agree, if you mean the lyx-paragraph layout latex.
but this is independent from ert-stuff-question.
> | tex/latex stuff. you don't answered my question: where
> | are the advantages for the user with the new ert inset?
>
> able to close it. (the only one I guess)
no comment ;-)
> We are now more strict about what can be in a ert inset, and this
> strictness has always been what LyX has supported, albeit not
> supported.
do you want to say, that in future ert is no more pure
latex-stuff?
Herbert
--
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/
