Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> | > BTW, I agree that the ERT insets should (always/by default) be inlined.
> | > Some of my documents look *really* awful now.
> |
> | http://www.perce.de/lyx/LyXAPL2.lyx (200kb)
> |
> | is a 1.1.6fix2 lyx-file. please load it with latest
> | cvs and tell me the sense of the new ert-inset.
>
> I must admit that I feel that you are falling for your own grip... You
> use too much ERT and for things that has never been guaranteed to
> work. But I am sure the compability reading can be made even better.
> More specific cases that goes wrong would be nice.
do you want to tell me, that i can get the same
output with less ert?? ;-)
my problem is a user-one! i can't understand your decision
to change ert. Kayvan said, that the code my be cleaner.
anyway, it's not one of the major features of lyx! but
it's one for the user, when writing all stuff with lyx
and not any text-editor. undepent of the needed pure
tex/latex stuff. you don't answered my question: where
are the advantages for the user with the new ert inset?
but there are some disadvantages.
Herbert
--
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/
