>>>>> "Baruch" == Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Baruch> One addition though, we'll need some method to easily add such
Baruch> operators, for example in Real Analysis there is a need for an
Baruch> ess-sup operator that is not usually defined, this operator
Baruch> effectively should be rendered like sup or lim with the limit
Baruch> under in.

Baruch> I'm pretty sure that there are more of this things in various
Baruch> branches of mathematics so it should be possible to add to it
Baruch> on runtime/startup.

This would just mean implementing \mathop{}, AFAIK. And then many math
operators could be defined as (internal) user-defined macros. Of
course this would be practical only if macro edition is changed to add
the extra boxes only when needed (when a parameter is used more than
once). 

JMarc

Reply via email to