Ok, I am convinced now.
Could you accept the following:
- There is a sub/superscript inset.
- The \limit/\nolimit information is part of this inset.
- When written to LaTeX, it will simply output _{...}^{...}.
- When displayed on screen, it will look one char/inset back and use that
information to draw itself.
This is some kind of exception, but I think it is a special case anyway.
TeX uses extra catcodes for ^ and _ and people are used to a certain way to
move around those beasts. I don't think implementation will get dirtier
than it is, on the contrary, e.g. the bigop inset will become much smaller
now.
Andre'
--
Andr� P�nitz ............................................. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: super/subscript insets Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: super/subscript insets Andre Poenitz
- Re: super/subscript insets Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: super/subscript insets Andre Poenitz
- Re: super/subscript insets Alejandro Aguilar Sierra
- Re: super/subscript insets Andre Poenitz
- Re: super/subscript insets Eran Tromer
- Re: super/subscript insets Andre Poenitz
- Re: super/subscript insets Eran Tromer
- Re: super/subscript insets Andre Poenitz
- Re: super/subscript insets Andre Poenitz
- Re: super/subscript insets Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: super/subscript insets Andre Poenitz
- Re: super/subscript insets Dekel Tsur
- Re: super/subscript ins... Andre Poenitz
- Re: super/subscript insets Eran Tromer
- Re: super/subscript insets Andre Poenitz
- Re: super/subscript insets Andre Poenitz
- Re: super/subscript insets Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: super/subscript insets Baruch Even
- Re: super/subscript insets Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
