Re: Re-implementing open-stuff [questions about insets and signals]

[Jean-Marc Lasgouttes]

>>>>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Angus> Because having a hideDialog signal or close() method makes
Angus> sense only for those methods that have a popup.

Well, all the insets have edit(), which acts as a kind of open(), so
they could have a close().

Angus> This is the alternative, I guess. close() would default to
Angus> close() {} for insets without a dialog.

Yes.

Angus> Maybe a combination of both these ideas is best (would reduce
Angus> code-bloat anyway).

Probably. 

I will also need a way of toggling or, alternatively, to know whether
an inset is open or closed. Is that possible?

JMarc