On 02-Jul-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:

>| One more stuff Lars I REALLY would apreciate if you would leave the
>| 'if ((expr == oexpt) || some_bool)' parentesis untouched. I think we
>| already discussed this and at least in the files I have to work with
>| "A LOT", I'm faster to see what happens if I have the parentesis in place.
> 
> Please split the if instead.
> 
> if (expr == oexpt
>     || some_bool) {

Well I do this always if I see it's to complex for one row!

> it is just that those (()) alway make suspicious about what is going
> on in thos ifs...

Well I only do the (()) when it is requested by the compiler otherwise
there are always ((..) || xxx && (...)) I like to have a boolean expression
always inside () so I exactly know what's going on!

        Jürgen

--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen Vigna        E-Mail:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N       Tel/Fax: +39-0471-450260 / +39-0471-450253
I-39100 Bozen           Web:     http://www.sad.it/~jug
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._

Emacs, n.:
        A slow-moving parody of a text editor.

Reply via email to